8 May 2015

Three party leaders resign within 90 minutes

​Three party leaders have now resigned in the space of 90 minutes. Ed Miliband’s must be the biggest emotional shock to the individual concerned. Unlike Nigel Farage, he hasn’t just announced a potential leave of absence; unlike Nick Clegg who thought his time in government was quite possibly over and therefore his time as leader too.

Ed Miliband before the polls shut last night thought No. 10 was within his grasp, he might confound the doubters and get into No. 10.

His team was busily briefing that David Cameron trying to force his way back in the door of Downing Street without a majority was unconstitutional. Back-channel conversations with the Lib Dems about a possible deal that could involve asking the SNP MPs to abstain in any confidence vote to spare Labour the embarrassment of supporting him.

All that went out the door when the exit poll emerged at 10pm and was quickly confirmed by early results that suggested, if anything, that the exit poll had underestimated the Labour rout.

The grand plan to locate and shape a different centre ground in British politics had been flattened in front of Tory steamroller campaign shaped by austere times, fear and voter unease about Labour.

It would be all the tougher for Ed Miliband to process this sudden descent from hope to failure because he actually shattered family relations in order to trial his political experiment.

Ed Miliband struggled with his emotions as he a told a room of cheering supporters how much he’d enjoyed the campaign and how he took absolute and total responsibility for the result. He said his party needed to “rebuild” and “now it’s time for someone else” to take it forward the moment he’s finished at the Cenotaph commemoration for VE Day this afternoon. Harriet Harman would be acting leader, just as Margaret Beckett was acting leader after John Smith’s death.

He thanked the British people for their stories told to him, for the selfies and for the  most unlikely cult of the 20th first century, Milifandom.

He gave no clear direction for his successor. Instead he expressed his affection and warned the party not to mourn its defeat.

But Labour may now fall into the factions that were largely covered up by his approach to the leadership. He worked with the grain of the Labour movement, chose not to define himself against the party as Tony Blair did. He seemed to acknowledge that with a warning to the party to keep things “agreeable” as it chooses a new leader.

Follow @GaryGibbonblog on Twitter

Tweets by @garygibbonblog

4 reader comments

  1. Praetorian says:

    Truly amazing election not only for the number of leaders forced out but also for the extent of the Conservative majority. Not a single commentator nor polling company predicted it nor came even remotely close, which raises its own questions.

    Of all the leaders to go, will never understand Clegg, had it all in 2010 but lost it almost as soon as he entered the No. 10 Rose Garden, simply never recovered from issues like tuition fees. Tories played the election perfectly specifically annihilating their coalition partner, politics is most definitely a deadly game.

    One typo in the article above, Miliband referred to the 21st not 20th century.

  2. Philip Edwards says:


    Ed Miliband got what he deserved, no matter how unexpected.

    He could hardly denounce the political traitor Blair because he was part of New Labour himself. All that waffle of “…mistakes were made…” was seen for just what it was, mere tenth rate pr opportunism.

    The same goes for the rest of the New Labour gang. Now the Jocks have given them the boot, it’s up to what’s left of the rest of the country to do the same. At least until the “leadership” returns to its roots and principles. Until that happens the current Labour Party is dead meat.

    For the coming parliament we KNOW what’s in the offing. More horror, more victimisation of our most vulnerable, the tory wet dream of privatising the NHS, tax gifts to the spiv rich, more thefts from national wealth to corrupt London, wasted money on “defence,” and probably more warmongering.

    It isn’t as though the last thirty five years haven’t been a warning. Because of it, this country is about to get an even worse dose of what it deserves.

  3. Lisa says:

    At one point labour was winning there got a lot more votes then anyone all off a suddon labour got dropped down labour shud have won end off the day all this has been a cone that all I’m saying on the matter

  4. Richard Gray says:

    Gary Gibbon isn’t asking the crucial questions about the validity of the first past the system. He needs to attend to the politics rather than the personalities and the real issues not the gossip

Comments are closed.