Published on 23 Mar 2013

Searching for truth in the debris

What follows amounts to Syria’s version of events in the attack near Aleppo on Tuesday in which 26 people died in unexplained circumstances. It comes from three senior medical and military sources in Damascus and in the Aleppo area. All wish to remain anonymous.

It is the government version of events but it conforms to the few undisputed facts of the case: the low number of causalities for an alleged chemical attack; the fact that the UN took Syria’s complaint seriously and acted upon it and the fact that Syrian soldiers are among the fatalities.

Damascus says it has conducted tests on the Victim’s blood samples and also soil samples and the rocket debris itself.

It says the results have already been sent to the UN team investigating. I am told the Syrian officials have also supplied the phone numbers of the doctors who treated the victims to the UN and has vow to co-operate fully with the UN investigation which is now underway.

Syria believes the chemical involved was a relatively small amount of chlorine gas, namely CL17 which was dissolved into saline solution in a home-made rocket. Two separate military sources have confirmed to Channel 4 News that it was a rocket and not a shell.

Syrian sources say the missile was fired from an area close to Al-Bab which they say has been in the control of the Islamist group Al-Nusra Front for some time and that it hit a military checkpoint on the edge of Khan al-Assal to the west of Aleppo.

Chlorine is ranked Tier 2 on the international classification of banned chemical weapons. That is, it is a known chemical agent capable of being weaponised and producing harmful effects but due to the way it vapourises and the toxicity involved, it is not considered a weapon of mass casualty effect in the way that Tier 1 chemicals such as sarin would be.

It is known that Iraqi forces experimented extensively with chlorine before deciding against it for these very reasons.

It is obviously easily available being widely used as a chemical in industrial sectors as well as for keeping swimming pools clean. There is also (and this my prove a telling detail) a chlorine factory just to the east of Aleppo.

All in all weapons experts would consider chlorine as a not particularly effective chemical weapon in terms of effect, but one ideally suited to home-made weaponising because of factors like its stability and availability.

In short the kind of device that conventional armies would not be interested in, but a militia group might just be. The area it hit, Khan al-Assal, has been in government hands since 17 March in an area where control often changes hands rapidly between the rebels and the Syrian Army.

All sources we have spoken to say there is a pattern of victims suffering a variety of respiratory complaints from mild breathing difficulty, through fainting and vomiting to loss of consciousness and death. In most cases there were no signs of any conventional blast injuries in terms of external lacerations, burns or fractures, they say. Quite simply, one medical source connected to the hospital in Khan al-Assal said he has never seen anything like it.

Let me stress again this is a war. All sides tell lies. I do not say any of this is credible or otherwise. But I do say that whatever Syria told the UN, the UN certainly found it credible enough to investigate. It is the most detailed account yet of what the Syrians believe happened.

Follow Alex on Twitter via @alextomo

Tweets by @alextomo

13 reader comments

  1. Philip Edwards says:

    Alex,

    Thank you for this.

    It is one step nearer the truth.

    In that situation it is about as much as we could hope for right now.

    We hope the evidence leads to the guilty party, whoever it is. Then they should be arrayed in front of the world at the International Court in the Hague.

    As for the UK government’s part (and the USA and other Europeans) in the Syrian Civil War – Not In My Name. Not ever.

    1. Hus says:

      Dear Mr Edwards, could you please explain why you invariably address Mr Thomson in such intimate terms and seem to make a point of commenting on each and every single post he writes?

  2. Hus says:

    Excuse me but can you explain how Syrian regime sources become reliable?

    1. Bill Rood says:

      Excuse me, but can you explain how Syrian rebel sources become reliable, or western governments and their lapdog media that manufactured lies and propaganda to justify invading Iraq and bombing Libya, destroying two of the highest living standard, most secular societies in the Arab world?

  3. Hus says:

    And Alex, have you managed to meet with Syria’s most outraged bystander? You have no excuse not to, given how well connected to the “government” you apparently are.

  4. Omar says:

    Everyone in their right mind know that its the disgusting FSA who did this attack?
    Why would the government attack a road checking point of its own, in a city full of government supporters?
    Its seems that Alex has not learnt the lesson of how disgusting this blood-thirsty Jihadist movement called the Free Syrian Army after they tried to assassinate him a year ago !

    1. Omarevo says:

      the so called “Free Syrian Army” are Jihadists ???? think again

      there are about 23 militant groups fighting in Syria now, only one of them is claiming to be a religious movement whcih it’s “Jabhat An-Nusra”, while the other 22 are secular movements who raise the mottos of “Democracy & Freedom” nonsense

  5. Hus says:

    Why do some people call the regime “government”? Is the opposition seeking the overthrow of the prime minister or ministers who tremble like a leaf before the lowest ranking regime security officials?

  6. omar b says:

    We ,the syrians, thank you ,the westeren, we sendtyou the doctors,minds, you send us the jihadists .our national army fights a’lqaida and al-nosrah front wich you support.
    Our soldiers die to give you the security ,we dont want your support for us just stop apming and sending jihadists.put your minds on not off!!!

  7. John the damascene says:

    You must be having a laugh!! Secular movements inside the FSA?!!
    The FSA is killing , destroying, bombing every single civilian, soldier, churches, buildings for people that don’t share the same Wahhabi philosophy with them. The assassination of the Sunni cleric Al-Buti last week is just the latest example for their barbarism. FSA is 100% terrorist group and every one knows that -including the US- and it’s financially supported by the Wahhabi royal families of Qatar and Saudia. Logistically supported by Turkey and aided to smuggle the Syrian factories, wheat harvest, cotton harvest through the province of Aleppo into Turkey to be sold for 10% of its value. That is what the FSA is. A group of crooks, smugglers, murders, and Wahhabi fanatics.

  8. BasharTheButcher says:

    It’s obvious that if Bashar the Butcher wanted to start using Sarin, he would test the waters with milder chemical weapons. And then he would target his own people, just as he bombs innocents from helicopters or by shelling their homes, so that he can pin it on freedom fighters.

Comments are closed.