1 Oct 2015

Syria: why this is not the start of World War Three

So the Russians and Americans are now bombing Syria, and the Russians are bombing the very rebels the US gives military aid to, and that’s a proxy war, and it’s knife-edge, and it could cause a Third World War, and…and…and…

Whoah! Calm down.

Pour yourself a large mug of something warm and soothing. Deep breaths. Now have a look at this. Your five-point guide to what the Russians are doing and why Third World Wars and proxy wars are as fanciful in Syria as they were in Ukraine..

1. It’s about Ukraine, and you should feel better about the West. Amid all the constant white-noise of masterstrokes by Putin, in fact the Ukraine adventure has halted in the dust, then the coming mud, then the ice of Donbass.

Targeted western sanctions have worked rather well, though they are boring and make lousy TV. Russia is hovering in recessionary gloom.

Putin needs a tiger to kill or be filmed wrestling with a killer whale or.. something. Aha! Syria is the answer. He looks tough, looks to be standing up to Washington, and in dictatorial Russia the supine media will carry that message home – or else.

He also knows if you can bring Crimea back into Russia at gunpoint, a few bombers over the Syrian deserts are not going to lead to Armageddon.

2. The West cannot bleat on about Russian interference – not after Iraq, not after Afghanistan – and Russia thus far is mounting just an air campaign.

This of course is no more than the West is doing, except Russia has the invitation of Damascus while the West does not.

Like them or not, the Assad government remains the recognised government of Syria, however much they may butcher their own people.

Equally, the West is not in any position to complain if the Russian bombs kill civilians. Over 165,000 Iraqi civilians have died since the US-led coalition invaded in 2003. The Russian bombers have some ground to make up.

3. Russian interests were under threat. That is unarguable.

Tartus and Latakia on the coast give Russia warm-water ports in the Mediterranean and they are not about to relinquish them to the anti-Assad rebels of Jaish al Mujahhideen.

This strand of anti-Assad fighters are absolutely not Islamic State (IS) and are close enough to the northern Latakia countryside to hit the area with Grad missile batteries. The Alawite Assad heartland on this coastal belt is thus under threat as much as Russian ports and recently-beefed up airbases.

Damascus and Moscow’s interests coincide, and the bombers have been duly scrambled.

4. After one day of high-wire bombing it seems the Russians and Americans will finally get round a table to bring a little air-traffic control into the game.

Having the Russian Three-Star general pop round to the US Embassy in Baghdad to see the military attache and say, “by the way, we are bombing Syria in one hour so you may want to clear the skies” is no way to proceed.

That was what happened yesterday. Today things on this side ought to be somewhat less chaotic and off-the-cuff.

5. The Putin promise – he said yesterday it is air-only, no ground combat forces. It is in support of the Assad army.

It is limited in time and Russia has no interest in getting deeper into the conflict. Domestically that would be hard, with Afghanistan still etched into the Russian psyche.

It might also bring escalated sanctions and that – as we have seen – is the very thing Putin wants to avoid while acting tough and walking tall globally.

A limited air-campaign would seem to tick all his current boxes – though the dangers of mission-creep are ever present.

But…there is one big but. Russia has said it is about attacking IS as well.

So far they do not appear to have hit anything at all inside the bloody so-called IS caliphate. Damascus is not bothered by that, as IS remain useful in deflecting global animosity from them.

But time is not infinite in this. The Russians have to start hitting IS in some degree or they will be unprotected against the argument that they are there to prop up the butcher Assad and nothing more.

Follow @alextomo on Twitter

Tweets by @alextomo

7 reader comments

  1. Matthew says:

    So why is Jon Snow talking in concerned tones about the US and Russia hardly talking to each other? And Obama has gone eerily quiet. Neocons telling him what to say? God help us all.

  2. Alan says:

    So much for MOD/State department press pack, what do you think Mr Thomson?

  3. Philip Edwards says:


    Before you lose your credibility….read this: http://www.chomsky.info/onchomsky/1998—-.htm

    You’re in grave danger of selling out.

  4. Nicholas says:

    Unfortunately, Alex, it’s not Russia’s responses, unusually measured and reasonable on Ukraine and Syria, which worry me but those MAD, scheming sobs in the Pentagon and the Israel Lobby, not to mention the military industrial complex which simply loves war; and the circumstances, a perfect storm, are such that this is a war which, once it degenerates, could go on indefinitely. Is this our generation’s ‘Cuban Missile Crisis’?

  5. Kenny says:

    Good analysis but damn the propaganda that Assad is butchering his own people. That is western hogwash!

  6. kris says:

    why wouldn’t it be the start of ww3? america is sending in ground troops to syria, germany is flooded with millions of refugees, russia is winning, and the proof is the fact that germany is taking in all the refugees. the syrian war (another fanciful project of “the west”) is a disaster. berlin would be better off in the russian-chinese sphere of influence.

  7. Uby says:

    Isn’t it always about the West? I will be suprised if it was not. Somehow, the whole world seems to neglect that Africa as a continent is under a serious terrorist siege. But oh no, what everyone else is concerned with is the West/East.

Comments are closed.