Published on 15 May 2014

Doubts over disability figures

A vision for radical reform – built on hard facts. That’s the promise of Iain Duncan Smiths’ ambitious reworking of the welfare state.

And it all comes down to facts and figures – how many people are on benefit, who’s getting it that shouldn’t, how many are moving back in to work?

The numbers matter.

But it’s clear that the figures – or at least how the secretary of state for work and pensions and his department present them, have been controversial.

Iain Duncan Smith himself has already been brought to task over claims made last year that the benefit cap had seen 8,000 people move into work.

The UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) upheld a complaint about Mr Duncan Smith’s proud boast with the rather blunt phrase , “unsupported by the official statistics.”

It’s not the only time the authority has taken issue with the way the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is using figures about benefits.

Complaint upheld

We can reveal the latest complaint put to the authority about DWP figures has been upheld.

This time it was to do with a key claim underpinning Mr Duncan Smith’s decision to abolish Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and replace it with a new benefit, the Personal Independence Payment.

The DWP literature – and minsters in interview – argued that “more than 50 per cent of decisions for Disability Living Allowance were made simply on the basis of a claim form alone, without any additional medical evidence.”

Implicit – and sometimes made explicit – was the notion that people were getting the benefit too easily – that “something for nothing” culture the government often talks about.

But the campaign group, Parkinson’s UK , said they knew – from the department’s own statistics funnily enough – that the 50 per cent figure was wrong.

They complained to the statistics authority and their complaint was upheld.

The UKSA said the claim was “ambiguous” and that a more accurate statement would be that that only 10 per cent of claimants  had received DLA on the basis of a claim form alone.

Donna O’Brien, who submitted the complaint on behalf of Parkinson’s UK said: “The Department of Work and Pensions has a long track record of misusing statistics when it comes to the benefits system, and it’s clear this was a tactic to vindicate further welfare cuts.

“People with Parkinson’s who claimed DLA have told us supporting medical evidence was crucial due to a woeful knowledge of the condition amongst assessors, and it is absurd that the Government was trying to imply that anyone going through the system had an easy ride.”

This is not a recent blip.

As far back as 2011, the work and pensions select committee warned the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) needed to take more care when releasing and commenting on benefit statistics, to make sure media stories were “accurate”.

Three years on, and the question being asked is whether the problems with statistics are down to incompetence or wilful attempts to mislead?

The chair of the work and pensions select committee, Dame Anne Begg, told me it was a bit of both perhaps. She added that the department and ministers still had work to do to make sure the way statistics on benefits were presented didn’t end up adding to an already febrile debate – with too many of the recipients left feeling like scroungers.

The DWP told us tonight that it leads the way on “openness and transparency.” The Statistics Authority have only written to them on a small number of occasions and they have taken on board their suggestions.

 

Follow @JackieLongC4 on Twitter

 

Article topics

,

Tweets by @jackielongc4

4 reader comments

  1. Philip says:

    If DWP “leads the way on “openness and transparency”, God help us! Unfortunately this manipulation of figures, misleading or partial use of them is so commonplace with no real sanctions in place to deal with offenders that they’ll keep on doing it. The result is that no-one believes what the Government says and the civil servants share in this destruction of any reputation for integrity.

  2. Philip Edwards says:

    Jackie,

    You expect Iain Duncan Smith to tell the truth?

    Don’t hold your breath, girl………..

    Take his words “radical reform,” for instance. Everybody with their wits about them knows this ACTUALLY means, “Rob from the sick, elderly and vulnerable and give to the tory-supporting rich.”

    He and William Hague together could make a duo called “Two Drones.” Now that applies in every sense of the words. Just hope your parents are never subject to the kind of insensate brutality those two dole out to those less fortunate than themselves.

    Smith of course is merely trying to show how “hard” he can be to prove to the tories he wasn’t a weak leader with a whining voice. He does that by kicking people while they are on the floor. Like all tories, the fellow is a coward and a bully, a tenth rate Gradgrind or Bounderby.

  3. Jayne Linney says:

    This is the reason we established our Petition 2 – HOC STOP Ministers Spinning LIES http://jaynelinney.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/petition-2-hoc-stop-ministers-spinning-statisitcs/ … … … …People Fight Back #ImpeachDWP

  4. Norma Roberts says:

    The next time I complete an ESA assessment form I may play them at their own game: State that I have one leg and see out of one eye, I will not bother to mention that I have another leg , or the fact that I see out of my other eye as well.

    I will do as they do, lie by omission, or just spin the facts to death!

    Only difference is, I would get into serious trouble, IBS et al seem to be coated in teflon!

Comments are closed.