Published on 1 Jul 2015

Heathrow third runway: business says ‘pick up the shovel’

It’s taken a three year-long investigation but today the Airports Commission announced what many had been expecting. That a third runway at Heathrow is the preferred option to expand Britain’s airport capacity.

Sir Howard Davies said a new northwest runway at Heathrow was the “clear and unanimous” choice and said it would add £147bn of economic growth and 70,000 new jobs within the next 35 years.

01_heathrow_CGI_w

Many had expected Sir Howard to leave the door open to Gatwick which had been one of the three options on the shortlist for expansion. And while the commission agreed Gatwick was feasible, it concluded “the additional capacity would be more focused on short-haul intra-European routes and the economic benefits considerably smaller.”

Sir Howard said: “Heathrow is best-placed to provide the type of capacity which is most urgently required: long haul destinations to new markets. It provides the greatest benefits for business passengers, freight operators and the broader economy.”

There was some wiggle room, however, given Sir Howard said Heathrow would only get the green light if it could clear a series of hurdles including a legal commitments on noise and air pollution and a ban on all night flights – although these are all areas that Heathrow would claim to have covered in its submission.

There was also a recommendation that the government promises not to expand Heathrow with a fourth runway in the future.

‘Pick up the shovel’

Business will certainly welcome the decision with open arms. Heathrow had always been its preferred choice given the airport is a hub and already provides links to long-haul international destinations.

It’s big issue was these routes desperately need to be expanded, to more emerging, high-growth markets in Latin America and Asia. And Sir Howard reckons that 40 such new routes can now open up.

The resounding response from business today is ‘pick up the shovel and get going’. But it’s important to remember that all this, for now, is all theorising.

We have been here many times before with airports expansion and given its deeply political nature, the plans have always always ended up being shelved. And this time around is no different.

David Cameron may well rue the day he declared no third runway “no ifs, no buts” as he stood alongside Greenpeace planting trees on the proposed site in 2009 – though he will be at great pains to say this proposal – backed by an independent commission – is an entirely different one to the plans put forward back then.

He will face intense pressure by a powerful cabal of MPs including Philip Hammond, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Zac Goldsmith, Justine Greening among others.

The London mayor has already this morning described the Heathrow decision as “the wrong answer to the wrong question” and insisted a third runway would never be built.

But Sir Howard urged the prime minister to crack on. He said: “The commission urges it not to prolong this process, however, and to move as quickly as it can to a decision.

“Further delay will be increasingly costly and will be seen, nationally and internationally, as a sign that the UK is unwilling or unable to take the steps needed to maintain its position as a well-connected, open trading economy in the twenty-first century.”

However Sir Howard’s recommendation is not binding and a decision is expected to take at least until the autumn – a very long time in politics.

And don’t forget the price tag. Sir Howard has opted for the most expensive option of the lot – at nearly £18 billion – as the next round of government austerity cuts is about to kick in.

Follow @siobhankennedy4 on Twitter.

Article topics

Tweets by @siobhankennedy4

3 reader comments

  1. Anthony Gould says:

    Boris Johnson is becoming more anti business than Ken Livingstone. His cycle super highways (not needed 24/7), junction roadworks and vast quantities of mini-cabs are causing gridlock in Central London. Other Cities in the UK limit the number of taxi licences. Bank and other Junctions could be made immediately safe by having cyclists dismount and use the pedestrian crossings. Cycle super highways are not necessary outside of peak-times. Now he opposes a third runway at Heathrow which has been recommended after 3 years investigation by independent experts. Uxbridge residents and others who live near Heathrow all need a thriving and expanding Airport. Most have moved there since the airport opened, obtained cheaper property as a result and now oppose expansion with all the noise/pollution conditions imposed on Heathrow by the Davies Commission.

  2. Philip Edwards says:

    Siobhan,

    The biggest load of coprolite in this whole circus of lies is this: Airport expansion in the south east would benefit the whole country.

    It will of course do no such thing. Any more than the London Olympics drugs fest brought benefit everywhere else. The claim is the biggest lie of all.

    There are plenty of alternatives that would bring greatly needed improvement to economies elsewhere in the country. None of them will happen of course.

    Me, I use Schipol as my travel hub. I wouldn’t go near that spiv rat run at Heathrow if they paid me. Or Gatwick or Stanstedt for that matter.

    It’s time that gang of shiny suited shysters in Lahndan realised that sooner or later their scam is going to blow up in their faces. So much for Cameron’s “Big Society.” We don’t have society in this country, we have Canary Wharf thievery administered from Downing Street and propagandised by the Murdoch and Daily Mail boot boy mob.

  3. Andrew Dundas says:

    Because I stay in Scotland, I’m obliged to wait 5-6 hours ay Heathrow/Gatwick for a connecting flight back home. Extending Heathrow westwards would be some improvement.

Comments are closed.