Published on 31 Oct 2011

Why the Olympus scandal affects us

So now Japan’s Prime Minister, Yoshihiko Noda has waded into the Olympus scandal. He tells the FT in an interview that he is worried that world will generalise from the specifics of what has happened at Olympus.

So let me recap. Two weeks ago, the company’s worldwide President and CEO Michael Woodford was fired – just six months after becoming President and a stunning two weeks after becoming CEO.

Mr. Woodford claims that he had found something very ugly in the Olympus woodshed – rather he had found something missing from the self same woodshed. A staggering $1bn of shareholder value – made up in part by $687m in ‘fees’ paid to an ‘agent’ in the take-over of a British company called Gyrus. Normally such fees range between 1 per cent and 2 per cent. The fees in the Gyrus take-over represented a shocking 36 per cent. Olympus make cameras and precision optical instruments. Gyrus’s business was at least in the same field. But in the same period, Olympus had also decided to take over several other companies which made completely unrelated products in which the company had neither expertise nor previous interest – companies that marketed face creams and plastic food boxes among them. Those take-overs necessitated the company writing off $600m in the first year of acquisition. Hence the combined total of loss to shareholders added up to some $1.2bn.

Prime Minister Noda is warning that the row threatens to contaminate Japan’s reputation for a ‘rules based market economy’. Olympus say all the payments were legal and appropriate, but cannot explain why much of the money ended up in a Cayman Islands entity which ceased to exist as soon as the cheques had cleared.

I have known Michael Woodford for several years. I have visited the plant in Southend that he ran as Olympus’s Director European operations. He had worked his way to the top after joining the company as a 15 year-old, thirty years ago. He is a driven, efficient, and principled man. His appointment, as a foreigner, to the top job in Japan’s third largest company was both a surprise and no surprise, He was the man for the job, His appointment was unanimously approved by the entire Japanese board, as was his firing two weeks later.

In the aftermath of the resignation its Chairman, on the heels of Mr. Woodford’s departure, Olympus says it will commission an independent investigation. Mr. Woodford questions how independent it will prove to be.

The Japanese Premier leads the Democratic Party of Japan. In 2009 his party defeated the LDP who had been in power since 1955. A factor in his victory was the national concern about corruption. There were allegations that Yakuza, the Japanese organized crime syndicate had grown considerably during the LDP’s rule. At the time of the election it was estimated that Yakusa had a membership of more than 100,000. One of the hallmarks of Yakuza’s activities is the penetration and distortion of corporations for illicit gain. Such is the power of Yakuza that few in Japan will speak openly of either their suspicions or knowledge of their activities.

So why does all this matter? Well, Olympus employs thousands of workers in Europe, a good number of them in the UK. Its share price has collapsed by 56 per cent since Mr. Woodford was fired. The FBI and the UK’s Serious Fraud Office are both investigating. Japan remains the world’s third largest economy. Japan is one of the economies that the Eurozone are looking to support the current bail-out. Japan may feel remote. The film ‘Lost in Translation’ neatly describes its ‘otherness’, but if Japanese corporate confidence sneezes we could all catch a cold that our immune systems are in no shape to combat.

Follow Jon on Twitter: @JonSnowC4

Tweets by @jonsnowC4

6 reader comments

  1. Meg Howarth says:

    Thanks for the fascinating back-story.

    As for a ‘rules based market economy’, we can all see more clearly that it’s one rule for the corporations and another for us.

    Wish I could remember the poet who wrote words to the effect that then (when writing) was the greatest time to be alive – the French Revolution was underway – Tennyson, perhaps? Because that’s how I feel now – there’s a spirit of optimism around as growing numbers of people seem to be losing their fear of challenging corruption and anti-democratic authority. Genuinely uplifting times. All we need to change things for the better is belief in ourselves and our fellow-citizens.

  2. Anon says:

    Olympus is the largest employer in Southend-on-Sea and I can’t help but worry about how this scandal will affect the hard working idividuals keeping that company running at ground level.

    1. Meg Howarth says:

      An example of why we need a Citizen’s (or Basic) Income (as well as tighter financial controls). We need urgently to separate the basic financial safety-net we all need in organised societies from employment. Non-means tested and paid at a level adequate for basic needs, combined with a four-hour employment day, CI/BI would give citizens greater control over their lives. Wage-slavery is not a situation to which we should continue to aspire. New thinking required.

  3. alan trinder says:

    It is interesting to see outlines the losses stated to shareholder value of some $1.2. It may be also be of help in assessing this situation to know if this sum includes the contribution that was taken when Olympus sold their diagnostic business. A business incidentally which was a part of the Olympus core area of expertise and, in many areas market leading.

  4. adrian clarke says:

    Hereby lies the problem with a global economy and the love of money.
    Money no longer has ,what was the primary reason of its being,and that is a trading means between individuals and countries.Its worth has been corrupted by individuals and countries who see it as a means of power.Not only that but,also as a reason for crime.
    It devalues individuals and makes others appear more important than they are or their status should be.No one can argue that someone like Bill Gates has produced and organised a commodity that is used worldwide.Yet is his value to society a billion more times the value of a nurse or a teacher or any other regular worker?Of course it isn’t.Yet money would have you believe so.
    Is a German worker,or French so much better than a Greek.Of course not , yet the Euro crisis would have you think so.Is a football or singer more important than a road sweeper or dustbin man.Of course not , yet money would have you think so.
    So is there any wonder that what could be construed as theft by individuals in a large corporation such as Olympus or the banks, worldwide ,takes place.Individuals seeking to enhance their power and position at the expense of the workers

    1. Meg Howarth says:

      Best thing you’ve ever written, Adrian. It’s the political and financial class, of course, that’s brought about this mind-set, not money itself. And the Labour Party has been a bag-carrying happy follower. New economics demands new politics. It’s still worth exploring why this happened at Olympus, with the British tax-haven of the Cayman Islands at its core.

Comments are closed.