1 Oct 2013

Can two old priests change the world?

We should have been at war by now. Of course we are still at war, but, given recent history, all the signs were that we would be at a new war by now. Hard to believe that just three weeks ago an American war on Syria looked horrifically probable.

There are US, UK and other special forces all over the areas of tension and conflict in the Middle East and beyond – from Pakistan to Yemen, from Jordan to Mali. And of course we are still heavily at war in Afghanistan, but now looking for any which way to get out.


Amid the abject failure of the Bush/Blair policy of military intervention, two clerics of pensionable age have arisen from the ashes of one of the most misguided periods of global intercourse.

First came the election of a bespectacled priest from Argentina of whom most of us had never heard. Jorge Mario Bergoglio became pope. We were intrigued that no Jesuit had ever become pope, we were uncertain what a prelate from Latin America would bring. We were touched that he would have no truck with his predecessor’s hand-made red shoes and ludicrous pope-mobile. But we were told he was conservative, even that he might not have been the most ferocious of priestly opponents of the country’s erstwhile military junta.

We dared not gamble that he would be relaxed about sexuality; that he would be as exasperated as any other sane man and woman by the constant catholic emphasis on contraception and abortion. He indeed proved so conservative that he actually believes in God and in living a Christian life – something many of his predecessors have managed to disguise at the very least.

Then came the election of another priest, this time a turbanised figure from Iran.

Dr Hassan Rouhani became president. Then came another priest. A man with a direct ecclesiastical link with Iran’s supreme leader. Rouhani was elected by a landslide having been approved for the temporal electoral slate by Ayatolla Khamenei.

We, who covered the election, were surprised by the openness and fervour of his rallies. We perhaps did not gamble that he would win. We thought it would all be fixed for one of the hardliners. Perhaps the reverse was true.

Pre News refresh player

Last week this priest did what no other Iranian has managed in more than three decades, he took the American establishment by storm, and was wise enough not to be seen clinching a presidential handshake to prove it. The unseen phone call said it all instead.

Both these priests have huge mountains of prejudice and doubt to climb. Both are in a hurry. They are in that age when a man knows that his time is perhaps limited. Rouhani is 64, Pope Francis is 76.

They both have angry opponents in their own ranks to quieten, let alone the forces beyond.

After more than a decade in which younger men – invariably men – have determined to resolve matters by military intervention, two older men have arisen who may at last herald a more creative and hopeful era. This 60-something year-old, at least, has decided to blog with optimism on his sleeve.

Follow @jonsnowC4 on Twitter

Tweets by @jonsnowC4

8 reader comments

  1. James White says:

    Most interesting thing I’m bbc radio 4’s profile was Rouhani’s devotion to his (dictatorial) mother. She decded on his wife to be, at 12, and at age twenty he said he couldn’t go against her.Regularly in touch by phone.

    1. Meg Howarth says:

      Had completely forgotten that – I heard the broadcast too. So perhaps Madame Rouhani is the power underneath the turban? But a cautionary note to men re women, from a woman: don’t make the mistake of believing that the female of the species is better/kinder/wiser… than you males. It depends on her upbringing, too, fundamentally on whether she felt loved as a child. The grass is not always greener…

  2. quietoaktree says:

    And where is the Rabbi ?

  3. Meg Howarth says:

    Bravo, Jon! My two favourite males – present company excepted, of course!

    I share your optimism. Time now for our cossetted baby-boomers to rise up to help shape that ‘more creative and hopeful era’ for which so many must yearn. ‘…in that age when a man [and woman] knows that his [her] time is perhaps limited’, what better way to spend what remains? It’ll be too late when we’re dead.

  4. Philip Edwards says:


    A good article, congratulations, except for…..

    “Military intervention”……..there you go again with establishment media Newspeak. IT IS INVASION AND MASS MURDER, NOT “INTERVENTION.”

    Why do you lose your courage when it REALLY matters?

    As for the two old priests, neither Bergoglio or Rouhani will make much difference unless they call upon their congregations to take mass peaceful action against the warmongers. ‘Twas ever thus, and ever thus will be.

  5. Phil Kay says:

    Interesting that when Bankers, Politicians, Police, Priests, Public employees, Fat Cats have turned greed into an art form that two men with VALUES should be so in line with the views of ordinary men and women.

    Thank God that our Parliament was forced by public opinion to do something Democratic about intervention in Syria that influenced USA.

    Let’s hope that these two aged clerics can persuade their flocks to live peacefully in a diverse world. It might catch on!

  6. margaret brandreth-jones says:

    In these days where hysteria and rebellions are rough and rife the globe could do with quiet conservatism. Age doesn’t necessarily carry wise leaders, yet there is something about the kind smile of these gents: a Gorbachev look?

  7. Gene Burke says:

    We have had war for 5 thousand years. Please lets give peace a chance.

Comments are closed.