Published on 22 Nov 2012

Cameron aims at Barroso’s pet projects

David Cameron was first in to see the European Council President Herman Van Rompuy this morning in what will be a series of “confessional”meetings – they’re listed in order here.

In the European Council document they each have 15 minutes next to the government leader’s name (with the exception of 30 minutes with Cyprus – current holders of the EU presidency).

But the chances of getting a meeting like this done in 15 minutes are remote – as David Cameron proved with his 35 minute meeting.

That probably means that the 27 meetings will drag on later than planned and the tantalising “cold dinner” the leaders have been told will start at 8.30pm could well come later.

At that dinner, Herman Van Rompuy will speak to the budget proposal he’s been telling leaders about in the days coming up to this summit and maybe sketch some first thoughts based on today’s conversations about how it could be changed to get everyone on board.

In his chat with Van Rompuy this morning, David Cameron wasn’t shown any new proposals but was probed on whether he could accept the current proposals for a budget of 940bn euros.

He said that wasn’t acceptable and said the commission should look for more cuts and start with those budgets that are growing considerably – like the European Commission President Barroso’s pet project, Connecting Europe , currently projected to treble in size.

The prime minister mentioned again the need to cut back administration costs and made several other suggestions which we may hear more about as the day drags on.

Quite what the PM and his counterparts are going to do in the down-time isn’t clear. There’s only so much “Angry Birds” you can play. An aide said he’d brought a “box” with him and I wondered if he meant a “boxed set” – it was a ministerial red box. The weather’s amazing in Brussels, cloudless and bright, so he might take a walk.

What’s his bottom line? His dream would be a cut or some budget figure he could plausibly sell as a cut. Recipient countries don’t want to give him that. He can’t support an increase if he wants to escape from his own backbenchers with his political life. So his hopes rest on getting an overall budget that can be described as a “freeze”.

But what’s the number for that? The one that gets quoted is the Treasury’s estimate of a real terms freeze from 2011 levels: 886bn euros. But No. 10 has been careful not to put an exact figure on what constitutes a “freeze” – “we have a few numbers in mind,” one aide said, suggesting there’s some flexilibity though it’s phenomenally little for a 27 country negotiation.

The latest Van Rompuy proposals are for a 940bn euro budget – closer, but not acceptable, David Cameron’s team says. The gap is in the order of £50bn, and that’s over seven years of spending.

You might think it shouldn’t be beyond the wit of able officials to scrape money out of some of the growing budgets and if necessary make some side deals to keep recipient countries happy. But David Cameron’s not the only one here with domestic politics to deal with and political rhetoric to live up to.

Follow Gary Gibbon on Twitter

Tweets by @garygibbonblog

2 reader comments

  1. anon says:

    How are Greece and Spain to mention just two members going to cope with an increased budget?

    Are the increased spending proposals going to help their deficit.or expand their economies.

    Or is the increased budget going to prop up failing economies.? Apart from growth,, cutting debt must be a priority.
    .If the increased budget is for propping up failing economies ,then we are back to the basic problem of some not being able to meet membership criteria.
    This is a sobering position to be in and increased expenditure in the budget will probably continue if debt reduction does not ease the situation.
    Europe needs to prioritise as do member states like Britain.

  2. CH says:

    Surely it’s clear that this is being used as an opportunity to decrease the size of national governments and increase the size and scope of a future federal European government? Many MEPs are fairly open about ‘the project’ and I haven’t dug particularly deep, a project which is all about deeper integration and federalisation. I’m sure that Germany, Belgium and Italy, plus potentially France (and also Netherlands?), are on board with this, plus it seems Spain, Portugal and Greece are being shoe-horned in as a result of their financial woes. At the end of the day if things were going well they’d be saying “we need to integrate to build on our success” or “we need to integrate to ensure that XXXX happens”. Whatever happens it is used as an excuse to integrate because that’s what a lot of people in Brussels want to see happen. That’s a large part of the reason they put themselves forward to be MEPs, and why many of them (particularly Verhofdstadt) are so annoyed that people like Farage are there and can’t understand why he’d not want to more enthusiastically wanted to contribute to constructing and enforcing new policies.

    The important thing for me isn’t so much the…

Comments are closed.