13 Mar 2017

Article 50: what will the letter say?

One Cabinet minister tells me that the Article 50 letter from the UK hasn’t been agreed at the top of government and that there’s serious disagreement still about how much detail it should go into in terms of headings for discussion and schedules of topics. Some want a much more information-light approach for the letter. The minister suggested that was why the government had gone cold on an early notification which many thought could happen tomorrow. No 10 insists that tomorrow was never in play.

On Thursday, Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, who already had quite a lot on their plates with Brexit, will head up to Scotland. Government colleagues say the visit of the No 10 Joint Chiefs is a coincidence as it is a postponed visit from a while ago to meet Tory MSPs. It will now have only one focus: Nicola Sturgeon’s referendum surprise.

They will discover there is barely embryonic planning amongst supporters of the Union. Even allowing for a bit of over-claiming, I don’t think that’s remotely true of the Yes camp.

One veteran of the No campaign in 2014 said he thought this time round there should be more made of the “please don’t leave us” emotional stuff that is believed to have helped to tip the balance in the second Quebec referendum. There were some late and rather red corduroy trouser dominated attempts in 2014 here. Is there more to be made of such ties in a second referendum?

One Tory MP for an English suburban seat in the South-East told me tonight: “I’m not sure we can win [a second Scottish referendum.] But we’ve got a better chance with the Scottish electorate than we’d have with my electorate.”

Tweets by @garygibbonblog

One reader comment

  1. George Gallee says:

    Me thinks it is time channel four news started informing listeners of the following.

    Firstly explain to listeners the advantage Scotland enjoys via the Barnett Formula.
    Point out that that the exchequer allocates at least £2000 more per head to Scotland than
    received (say) by the South of England.
    Don’t forget to point out that with 5 million heads in Scotland , Scotland comparitivley enjoys some £10 million more to spend compared to the South of England.

    Forget the overspend by the Tory party,
    Examine the £12.5 billion spent by UK on Foreign .Aid.
    Compare that committed by France and Germany, equalivent to approximately half spent by the U.K.
    So little news on the more relevant aspects which leaves the bulk of the UK public completely ignorant !

    Instead start informing the electorate the shambles that exists with the UK’s expenditure on Foreign Aid.
    Start with £12 Billion plus, which represents the UK’s 0.7% of the “gross national product”.
    A figure agreed by members of the E.U.
    Listeners will certainly be well informed if you explain that both France and Germany both proportionally spend approximately just half that amount of their Gross Domestic product.

Comments are closed.