Stuart MacGill is a more dangerous wicket-taking bowler than Shane Warne because his legspinner turns more and he retains a big-spinning, well-disguised googly.
Statistics back up this assertion because MacGill's strike rate in 33 Test matches prior to the Ashes was a wicket every 54.55 balls, significantly better than Warne's 59.07.
That Warne has been preferred over the past few years is because he gives Australia much greater control. While he rarely bowls a loose ball, MacGill, more the traditional leggie, is always likely to bowl one four-ball an over in his search for gargantuan spin.
Another factor that has worked in Warne's favour is that his batting and fielding are far superior to MacGill's.
But when MacGill has had a chance he has performed wonders, revelling in the intensity of the Test match environment. When Warne was injured during the 1998-99 Ashes series, England breathed a collective sigh of relief until MacGill span Australia to victory with 24 wickets in the series.
When Warne was absent in 2003-04 because of his drugs ban, MacGill grabbed 53 wickets in 11 games and demonstrated without question that he is a great bowler who has got better with age.
Unfortunately, opportunities to bowl in tandem with Warne, like a latter-day O'Reilly and Grimmett, have been rare. But in MacGill's last Test to date, against Pakistan at Sydney in January, they took a combined total of 13 wickets. That MacGill took eight to the great Warne's five is another illustration of what an unlucky man he is to have been around at the same time.
|