To overcome the patent flaws in the 'Run-rate method', an array of systems were invented. None of them were more controversial than the 'Best overs method'.
Devised for the World Cup in Australia in 1992, this system sought to make life harder for the team batting second, whom it was clear were the beneficiaries of the 'Run-rate method'.
In the event of a rain delay, the adjusted victory target would be reduced by the number of runs scored in the least productive overs of the side batting first.
For example, if ten overs were lost to rain, then the victory target would be reduced by the sum of the runs scored in the side batting first's quietest ten overs. If all of these were maidens, then the chasing side would be given ten overs less to reach the original target.
The intrinsic shortcomings of this method were given a public airing in the World Cup semi-final match between England and South Africa.
South Africa required 22 runs off 13 balls to win, a tough target but within their range. Then it rained. When play resumed the recalculation deemed South Africa needed 21 runs off just one ball!
A riot almost ensued, and the method was shelved for good.
|
