Dispatches

The Children Britain Betrayed

Exclusive

Peter Oborne

Friday 10 July 2009

Journalist - Peter Oborne

This was the most difficult piece of journalism I have had anything to do with. Occasionally I have witnessed scenes of horror in war zones, but nothing was as gruelling or as emotionally tough as talking to the victims of the tragedies we reported in the film.

I will never forget talking to brave Lyn Philcox about how her evil husband Brian tormented her family for months, then gassed their two children, Amy and Owen, in the back of a car. Or listening to Val Gee describing how her obsessive husband Chris tormented her for years before stabbing their son Ryan to death and nearly killing their daughter Donna.

I will always be haunted by the tortured face of little Amy Howson in a photograph taken shortly before her death. Her father had broken many of the bones in her body before finally breaking her back across his knee.

There were many cases like this and the film shows the evil and barbarism of which human nature is capable. But it was also very inspirational. I found the sheer courage of those who, like Lynn McAuliffe and Val Gee, had survived these tragedies profoundly moving. Both have been dealt the most crushing blow. And yet they get on with their lives. Val's two daughters, Natalie and Donna, were terrific and lively girls and a tremendous credit to Val and themselves.

In Manchester we interviewed Andrea Dennis, who had endured the horror of discovering her two grandchildren dead, killed by her mentally ill daughter Jael. Both she and her brave son Leighton were displaying awesome moral nobility by standing by Jael, a devoted mother who suffered from paranoid schizophrenia.

If making the film was very tough for me it was ten times tougher for Lynn Ferguson, Amy Walker and Charlotte Davis, the production team who travelled the country knocking on people's doors and hearing their sad, sad stories and gently suggesting they might want to talk about the lessons to be learned from these tragedies. The film took more than six months to make. Both the production team and the families made their extraordinary efforts for only one reason. They wanted people to learn about the horror of child homicide so that we as a society can start to take steps to prevent it.

In all the cases we looked at there were warning signs that showed that children were at risk. And yet each these warning signs were ignored. Social services, who so often get blamed, are not the only agencies who could help prevent one child a week violently dying in this country. The police, doctors, judges and all of us as ordinary people have a role to play in preventing tragedy. The message of this film is that many child killings can be prevented if only society can become more alert to the known risk factors.

Comments

Your Comments

Post your comment

Please note: In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in to Channel 4:

Sign In Here or Register Here

Comments closed

Comments are closed at the present time

Your comments

Post your comment
By posting on this website you are agreeing to abide by our Comments Policy.
Mandatory Fields are marked with *
Your Comment (Maximum characters: 4000) *
You have

Comments

Thank you for your comment!

Your message will be reviewed and the best ones will be published below.

If you intended to make an official comment to Channel 4 please contact us.

Comments

  1. I congratulate Mr Oborne on this documentary. I like many men, women and their children have suffered at the hands of an other. I am to-date representing myself through the courts trying to keep my child safe from my abusive ex-partner. Unless you have experienced the pain and torement that this documentary explored and have become emotionally disabled by the actions of others, or you are not a parent you will not fully understand the frustration, fear and total dispair that one feels when tring to deal with all these agencies and the court system. You are continuously swimming against the tide. So many times I have sat in court wanting to scream "Please, please listen to me. One of the flaws that I have found with the system is each agency has a small fragmented piece of the story (If they have chosen to listen to you and document it) unfortunately those small fragmented pieces never come together to make the whole picture so it is never seen. Someone commented on this site that even though this documentary pointed the failings of our system and it is very sad that this amount of children have died in this way, that more children die each year in road accidents. Please make note that as a parent you teach your children not to run out in the road, you do not have a court, judge or social worker telling you that you cannot hold your childs hand as they cross the street. You would not allow a person to delibrately push your child in front of a moving vehicle. Now think of all these dangers, now imagine what it is like as a mother or father to be told by a court or a judge or a social worker that you have to send your child to a relative or ex-partner that you know has alcohol issues, erratic behaviour issues, drug dependancy issue, or mental health issues. Where you know your child could be put in significant danger... This programme highlighted the topic of domestic violence, dependancy issues and mental health issue and the detrimental effects that this has on a fanily. Once society can address these topics head-on and violence within the home is not treated as such a taboo topic, then perhaps as a collective we will be able to change all that is failing our children. I look forward to Mr Oborne following this with a second episode, hopefully by the time he does, lets pray society has learned from mistakes and big improvments have been made in ensuring that our children are kept safe.
    Posted by Just on 16/07/2009 22:39:15
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  2. Your program was insightful and accurate; it mirrors my own experiences with the Family Court system and also mirrors my own experience with regards to the antiquated "contact must happen" stance. My heart went out to Lyn Philcox; there is nothing more frustrating than being ignored by the system. When mothers stop contact they are often portrayed in a negative light and their concerns are never addressed. If contact has to be supervised then the courts should look at address the reasons that are causing concern; the parent should go through programs such as anger management, parent skills course, rehab etc as a reward for participating in these programs they get supervised contact with their child/children. All too often the concerns of the mothers and the voices of the children are drowned out by experts, departments and judges paying more attention to the needs, wants and desires (but ignoring the failings) of the dysfunctional father. Great piece of reporting and I hope your program is the first step to making the courts aware that they are long overdue for a reform.
    Posted by M.Chapple-McCamish on 15/07/2009 13:20:57
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  3. I watched this documentary with a grim feeling that it has been proved right. Children are getting missed out that really need to be on the register. Whilst social services departments are chasing innocent families. Kids are at REAL risk. If a family is known to the police for Domestic violence. Then it is the kids in those houses really suffering emotional harm. It makes me so angry that innocent babies and kids are being killed every week. The baby P case plus the others highlights the dangers of NOT LISTENING or not acting to what really goes on behind some our neighbours doors. That really makes me angry. A parent with mental health issues just needs the right support in the right agency instead of being slated for having mental health issues. Bigotry and bias is not knowledge or education. This is what makes Social Services departments panic. The doctors and healthcare professionals need to work with Child Protection agencies to assess the needs of the parents or carers, prioritise. So this does not keep happening. This happened to us four months ago. Our children gone. Because of "psychological problems". We might in the future "emotionally harm" them states Social Services. I MIGHT get run over tommorrow.
    Posted by Melizza Moore on 14/07/2009 15:35:47
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  4. Thank you dispatches for bringing this out in the open. Far too many children are suffering due to lack of risk assessments and bullying tactics by SS, who are determined to ensure children have contact with abusive parent regardless.
    Posted by vegimum on 14/07/2009 13:45:19
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  5. I thought this programme was a bit of a curate's egg, in that parts of it were quite excellent while other parts were wide of the mark. I had particular concerns about the case study about the death of Lyn Philcox's children. This was presented as some terrible failing by social services and/or the judicial system when, in fact, it appeared that it was nothing of the sort (at least to judge from Mr Oborne's discussions with Wall LJ). The question for the judge dealing with the case was, it seems, not whether the children should have contact with their father (that already having been agreed outside court by Mrs Philcox and her ex-husband) but where the children should live. The judge, it appears, came to the conclusion that they should live with their mother and made a residence order in her favour. If Mrs Philcox believed that her ex-husband posed an immanent risk of serious physical harm to her children, why did she agree that he could have contact with them? And if Mrs Philcox did not foresee what her ex-husband would do to her children, how was the judge meant to do so? I doubt very much that the Daily Mail, the newspaper to which Mr Oborne makes many valuable contributions, would be silent if judges began enquiring into areas of family life that were not the subject of legal proceedings and began making orders regulating those areas uninvited and, possibly, contrary to the wishes and feelings of all the adults and children involved. By and large, the courts provide answers to the problems before them. Judges cannot (and should not) be expected to tour the country setting the world to rights after the fashion of Judge John Deed. If the legal system operated in that way, then the consequences for us all would be truly terrifying. The sad reality of the situation is that there is a small number of people in our society who will, for whatever reason, harm their own children (whether intentionally or unintentionally). Any system that is put in place to safeguard children is only ever going to be able to ameliorate the risk posed by such people rather than remove it entirely.
    Posted by Graeme Harrison on 14/07/2009 10:48:38
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  6. I watched this documentary with a grim feeling that it has been proved right. Children are getting missed out that really need to be on the register. Whilst social services departments are chasing innocent families. Kids are at REAL risk. If a family is known to the police for Domestic violence. Then it is the kids in those houses really suffering emotional harm. It makes me so angry that innocent babies and kids are being killed every week. The baby P case plus the others highlights the dangers of NOT LISTENING or not acting to what really goes on behind some our neighbours doors. That really makes me angry. A parent with mental health issues just needs the right support in the right agency instead of being slated for having mental health issues. Bigotry and bias is not knowledge or education. This is what makes Social Services departments panic. The doctors and healthcare professionals need to work with Child Protection agencies to assess the needs of the parents or carers, prioritise. So this does not keep happening. This happened to us four months ago. Our children gone. Because of "psychological problems". We might in the future "emotionally harm" them states Social Services. I MIGHT get run over tommorrow.
    Posted by Melizza Moore on 14/07/2009 09:28:03
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  7. I have had 2 seperate dealings with Social services - my daughter has alcohol and mental health issues and would regularly aqbandon her little one to go out partying for days on end and if she couldnt get anybody to watch the wee litttlw mite she would take him with her regardless of if she had bottles of milk nappies etc - the first social worker was amazing - gave me lots of advise to keep my 6 weel old grandchild safe and guided me through the court proceddings and backed my application for residence with a ss report. Alas she recentley had another child and was doing great for a few weeks like the last baby - sadly she has hit the bottle again and as she has her own place now and lives on her own and in my opinion is getting too drunk to look after a new baby - i once again rang social services. Not got the same social worker , this one isnt half as good. Hardly spoke to me about what has happened to make me call ss and doesnt really keep the family informed of what is happening (new baby is with the family by the way) - babies mum still drinking heavily, has lots of people at the house drinking with her. She just doesnt seem to get it that babies need your attention 24/7 and unless a suitable person is taken responsibility for a while you should be sober and available to care for your child at all times. Anyway daughter has a history of violence and all the isues that where on going with baby number 1 are satill there but me and my family are beginning to feel that social services are not tyaking our concerns seriously enough. review due in a few weeks but not sure a risk assesment has been done yet about mum and house which is not very fitting for a baby, she has a staffordshire bull terrior and various reptile that she probably has no control over when drunk. As this is her second child that concerns have been raised over ( the first one i have a residence order for) , according to what the programme says, she should have been monitored more closely but she missed appts for 6 week check, baby clinic, injections etc and still nobody picked up on it, it was left to me to phone them. any ideas whats next if im not happy with what they say ??? Bearing in mind she totally fooled a social worker when pregnant with first child, she was totally taken in by my daughter saying she doesnt drink and can cope and will put baby first. She reported no further action to be taken yet 6 and half weeks later there i was with a new baby not really knowing where to turn. What can i do to protect my little grandchild and where can i go next.
    Posted by Jonny Retro on 13/07/2009 22:32:38
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  8. My thanks to Peter Oborne and the team who produced this documentary and associated documentation. The more we can learn about the risks associated with child death the better. This is a very important documentary.
    Posted by Alan Cooper on 13/07/2009 22:07:34
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  9. i whatch this film tonight and it sceared me because so much of it reminded me of my now ex who finaly after almost 3 year together and almost 2 years of abuse from him i am finaly free but i still am fighting to get my children bk from socail services and to stop my ex from seeing my son but socail services despite me telling them finaly that my now ex has hit my son in the past and that i have at lest one witness ready to give a statment that he see my now ex hit my son hard enough to knock him to the floor but i am just ignored but all this could have been stoped by so meny diffrent people who since i have gotten free from my ex and told them about it have said they are not serprised or they had serpitions but noone ever tried to help me or my children
    Posted by azteka on 13/07/2009 21:39:32
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  10. It was very significant to watch the Lynn Philcox tragedy. My Son was 'kidnapped' by his father 2 days after Lynn's childen were murdered by their father. My other son was just four days old at the time. He was 'taken' for over 5 hours, i screamed in the street, to no avail, nobody came to help or did they even bat an eye-lid? I walked to a local primary school and they contacted the police for me. It has got to be the worst time of my life, so far. Luckily he was returned safely. His father then contaced Social Services, saying i was a prostitute and a drug addict. I contacted Social Services, and they were amazing. They had already received the information on my EX before he rang and had to contact me due to the law. They gave me lots of advice and telephone numbers to get help and possible councilling. His father used to rule my life, couldnt wear this and that, was not allowed to return to work etc etc. After the 'kidnap' i was REFUSED an injunction, as a father he had a 'legal right' to take him. When i later received a NEW solicitor, she was FURIOUS that i was not awarded one, furious. I believe that the law has changed slightly, and that the police will themselves prosecute and take it to court. I was too scared to press charges. I have a friend going through similar experiences. Just an unbelievable tragedy for a family to have to live with. Giving you ALL much strength and love to all RIP. PLEASE listen to ALL families with concerns. Thank you for reading.
    Posted by SH on 13/07/2009 21:15:42
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  11. The reason why there is such a shortage of Health Visitors is not because there are trained nurses who do not wish to become Health Visitors, but because Primary Health Care Trusts have drastically cut down on the number of Health Visitors being employed. These women are highly trained, and therefore more expensive than the less trained Nursery Nurses who have been taking over much of the work that Health Visitors used to do. Sandra Brewin (Retired Health Visitor)
    Posted by Sandra Brewin on 13/07/2009 21:10:09
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  12. Probably the most peversly biased programme I have seen on Channel four in as long as I can remember. When society has nothing better to do than blame the establishment for deaths. If a mother feels it is safe to send their children to their fathers house, why should a social worker take responsibility for the outcomes? Whilst it is obviously wrong for anyone to be killed, these situations are not always predictable. This show seemed to simply want to remove any responsibility from the parents/families of these children... am I the only one who does not think this makes sense. A very dissapointing reflection of things to come.
    Posted by Rachel on 13/07/2009 20:56:52
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  13. Thank you for this programme. But please ask your presenter/jounalist to use the correct terms- not 'access' or 'custody', it is 'contact' and 'residence'. Please refer to s.8 The Children Act 1989. The much out of date terms access/custody are so out of date, and do not reflect much understaing of the key safeguarding issues children face when their parents searate, Thank you.
    Posted by Lesley Beveridge on 13/07/2009 20:54:27
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  14. Very good programme but what about all the children social workers do save through their work! I guess that such statistics as that do not make good television programmes! It is a shame that again, the media is focussing on all the negatives which will only put more pressures on existing social workers in the crisis of recruitment due to the bad press the profession is getting. Yes I agree the childrens deaths focussed on upon are awful and may have been preventable, however, it should be noted that social workers or health professions did not kill these children but the parents did! Why or why cant the media just focus on the positives for once and celebrate the children and families they have helped and saved the lives of.
    Posted by David on 13/07/2009 20:31:26
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment

Next on:

Monday 16 November

8PM, Channel 4

Advertisement

Skip Channel4 main Navigation
Explore Channel4
Food
Homes
Film
4Car
News
See All

Channel 4 © 2009. Channel 4 is not responsible for the content of external websites.