28 Aug 2013

UK calls for UN to back Syria strikes

The UK has drafted a resolution and is seeking the backing of the UN Security Council for “all necessary measures to protect civilians” in Syria, said David Cameron.

A UK-driven draft resolution will be put to a meeting of the five permanent members of the council in New York on Wednesday evening.

“We’ve always said we want the UN Security Council to live up to its responsibilities on Syria. Today they have an opportunity to do that,” the prime minister said.

A team of UN inspectors set out on their second day of work examining sites of the suspected chemical weapons attack on 21 August in Syria. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that they would need four days to investigate, and more time after that to analyse their findings.

Military action must be taken after a decision from the security council – that’s what international law saysLakhdar Brahimi, UN envoy to Syria

“They are working very hard, under very, very dangerous circumstances,” he told a news conference.

The UN’s special envoy to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, said there was evidence to suggest that a chemical “substance” was used – but that any military strike in response must gain UN approval.

“Military action must be taken after a decision from the security council – that’s what international law says,” added Mr Brahimi.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said: “Britain has drafted a resolution condemning the attack by the Assad regime, and authorising all necessary measures under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter to protect civilians from chemical weapons.”

Intelligence gathering

The US and UK are expected to release intelligence information which they say proves the use of a chemical substance.

The UK’s national security council (NSC) is also meeting on Wednesday afternoon to discuss the intelligence gathered by UN inspectors and consider whether or not to push ahead with a military strike against President Bashar Assad.

The meeting comes ahead of Thursday’s recall of parliament, when MPs will debate the legality and implications of any possible military strike.

Syria’s government continues to deny the use of chemical weapons. The country’s foreign minister said: “We repeat that the terrorist groups are the ones that used (chemical weapons) with the help of the United States, the United Kingdom and France, and this has to stop.”

US plans

David Cameron spoke to Barack Obama over the phone several times in the last 24 hours, as both world leaders consider intervention following the death of an estimated hundreds of people by poison gas.

US Vice President Joe Biden said on Wednesday that there was no doubt that Syria’s government had used chemical weapons and that it must be held accountable. His comments follow those made by US Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday, who said it was “undeniable” that President Assad was behind the attack, which he called a “moral obscenity”.

Following the attack last Wednesday, shocking footage emerged of victims of the alleged attack, many of them children.

However the Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned on Wednesday that American intervention in Syria would be a “disaster for the region.” The Iranian state news agency quoted Aytollah Khamenei saying “The region is like a gunpowder store and the future cannot be predicted.”

Intervention under scrutiny

Mr Cameron said that any intervention in Syria would not be about the conflict itself, but preventing the use of chemical weapons by any regime.

Decisions about British involvement have not been taken, he said on Tuesday, adding that parliament was the “right place to set out all of the arguments”.

He said action must be “proportionate, have to be legal, would have to specifically be about deterring the use of chemical weapons”.

The prime minster added that Thursday’s debate would ensure “proper” scrutiny and allow the government to listen to MPs.

The Archbishop of Canterbury has warned MPs not to rush in their decision on whether to vote for military intervention in the Syria conflict. The Most Rev Justin Welby said the impact on those people not directly involved in the fighting was “beyond description and horrible”.

Meanwhie a YouGov survey for The Sun revealed that nearly three-quarters of people oppose the deployment of British troops to Syria, and a majority of 3-1 believe the government should be bound by Parliament’s vote tomorrow.