We've had 90-days of intense anti-Saddam propaganda since we last carried out our huge survey of British opinion over Iraq.



Our new poll, similar to the research being done inside Downing Street, tells us what progress Tony Blair has made in building support for his policy on Iraq, but also what buttons he needs to press to get public backing for a war.



Back in November we asked which country people regarded as the greatest threat to world peace. Number one - not surprisingly perhaps - was Iraq. Second the US. Third - Israel.



Now, though, Iraq has actually slipped down to third place. Second is North Korea. And the country Britons regard as the biggest threat today - the United States. On this evidence, Tony Blair is losing the Propaganda War.



So after endless speeches, dossiers, blurry photos and crackly phone intercepts, how convincing is the case for war?



We asked - true or false: Saddam has chemical and biological weapons. 74% the vast majority think that is true.



He's hiding weapons from the UN - 71% believe that.



Saddam has strong links to Al Qaeda? Only 33% think that's true - 34% say it's false the remainder said they didn't know.



Last Wednesday US Secretary of State Colin Powell played America's propaganda trump card at the UN. The Iraqis dismissed it as a stunt.



Was Britain convinced?



62% of people did not think his evidence amounted to proof that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction.



But look at this: 21% of the public - thats one in five - thought his evidence was fabricated.



65% of people think the government's case against Iraq is weakened by Channel Four News revelation that they'd copied chunks of an intelligence dossier from a twelve year old student thesis.



Looking now at what I call truth and consequences. What does the public really think is Tony Blair's motivation for possible war against Iraq?



Did people think he was driven by a sense of morality and justice or political self-interest?

A clear gender split on this question - among men, 41% think his motives are pure, 38% think its self interest. But among women only 30% said it was a moral issue, 46%, almost half are cynical about his motives. In fact women across the survey are more sceptical



So what can Tony Blair do?



Three months of case building and look what's happened.



This was the situaion last November - 13% said yes to military action, 9% no, 76% needed persuading.



Today - still 70% of people need to be convinced.



So would a second UN resolution do the trick? If Tony Blair had UN backing for war instantly his problem would be solved 82% would back military action. Without any UN support only 28% would back an attack alongside the Americans.



But here's something very interesting - if Tony Blair got a majority of the Security Council to back military action - even if one or two countries vetoed a second resolution - 62% would go to war.