Skip Channel4 main Navigation
Explore Channel4
Food
Homes
Film
4Car
News
See All
To the Ends of the Earth
Home
   Text only
Hell on High Water

The story

The race

What went wrong?

Stormy weather

Trouble at sea

Find out more

Travel tips

Rescue helicopter
Winched to safety  
 
 

Photomontage


What went wrong in 1998?

The Bureau of Meteorology report

Satellite image of storm

Satellite image tracing storm from 25-28 December (Japan Meterological Agency)

In its preliminary report about the weather forecasting service before and during the race, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology concluded that the possibility of hazardous conditions had been conveyed to both organisers and competitors two days before the race, on 24 December.

It had also issued a storm warning over the phone to 'key authorities' just over one hour into the race. (A 'storm warning' indicates an average wind speed of 45-55 knots/40-50mph, with gusts up to 70 knots/60mph, plus wave heights of 4-7 metres/13-23 feet, occasionally rising to 13m/43ft.) Reports from yachts involved in the disaster suggested that these warnings only marginally underestimated the storm, the BOM said.

The Cruising Yacht Club enquiry

Following an investigation, the race review committee of Australia's Cruising Yacht Club, which had been the organiser of the disastrous Sydney-to-Hobart race, concluded that:

  • The decision to race should remain with skippers of the boats.
  • Competitors saw no need for 'wide-sweeping' changes to safety regulations and equipment.
  • 'Exceptional' waves had caused most of the damage.
  • The Bureau of Meteorology had not accurately forecast the precise location and timing of the low-pressure system. It had also assumed that the sailors knew to expect winds 40% stronger and waves 86% bigger than had been forecast when, in fact, the sailors didn't.
  • No particular yacht size or type had fared worse than any other.
  • Many of the crews had been inadequately informed about the use of safety equipment and search-and-rescue techniques.
  • The club had not pursued training and education issues rigorously enough in the wake of the 1993 race, when two yachts had sunk and 64 others had had to retire damaged.

The committee decided that no one cause was responsible for the disastrous events, but did recommend a series of reforms:

  • A weather forecaster should be added to the Hobart race control centre to issue specific 'layman's' information to the fleet.
  • Competitors should be obliged to report winds above 40 knots (35mph).
  • Each skipper should report, at a certain stage of the race, his or her boat's ability to continue in light of weather warnings.
  • Crews should be more experienced, with no under-18s.
  • There should be qualifying races for new boats.
  • 30% of each crew should attend weather and safety seminars.
  • There should be more accurate position-indicating beacons. Personal strobes or high-density lights and dye markers should be carried, as well as hand-held VHF radios.
  • The club should scrutinise each entry more carefully with regard to seaworthiness and crew experience.
  • The race organisers' communication gear should be upgraded.

New South Wales coroner's inquest into the deaths

The inquest by the New South Wales coroner finished hearing evidence on 13 September 2000. The results are expected before the next race. Check out the Sydney Morning Herald website, which has up-to-the-minute news about the inquest, as well as a full archive about the tragedy.

Top