 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hull's Angel
A fascinating insight into our uneasy relationship with asylum seekers?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Andy Marwood
22nd July 03
The programme was interesting and left me to wonder what Tina's
real motives were. I felt it was well presented but for one
point - your reporter stated that Khalid, once granted Exceptional
leave to Remain in the UK was "British". Persons granted
ELTR or ILR do not automatically qualify for British Citizenship
or a British passport - This misleads people and is factually
incorrect. This is not a mere technicality, given the sensitivity
of the asylum issue in the UK.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
David Buckley
22nd July 03
After watching this program I empathised with the struggle of
the asylum seeker and the difficulties they must encounter.
I knew they experienced some difficulties with culture and religion
etc.. but it was not until I viewed a part of this program where
they had just heard that one of the sisters partners could stay
in the country and the jubilation that followed this that I
realised that the majority of these people are human beings
just trying to get on with their lives. Yes, there are going
to be asylum seekers who are going to take advantage of relationships
for gaining benefits and passports but that's not unique to
asylum seekers, I've been in relationships with my native countrymen
where this kind of thing has happened to myself.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Matthew Raper
22nd July 03
I sometimes feel deeply ashamed by Hull folk's narrow-minded,
ignorant and racist impressions of the 'guests', as they are
sometimes ironically refered to. Throughout my life, I have
longed for a city and a community to be unreservedly proud to
say I am from; I am proud, but I have never been sure of what.
I know that I speak for many people there. Hull is a place in
search of a new identity, and has been for almost 30 years,
in the absence of the old primary industry for which it was
known, fishing. Without this, or any other major source of work
for new generations of young people, there is little hope and
no obvious incentive for them to strive through their education.
Apathy, cynicism and crime fills the vacuum. The Home Office
need a place to house asylum seekers. 'Let's send them all to
Hull shall we? Perhaps this remote, disenfranchised city will
find it within itself to empathise with these unfortunate people,
and welcome them into its poverty-riddled communities?' Never
really likely was it, eh? I do not for one minute blame the
Kurds for seeking a better life, away from one in Iraq that
would make Hull people feel like landed gentry, but it was short-sighted
of the Government to introduce them into such a troubled city:
a chip on the shoulder of Britain which feels it would not be
missed if it fell off and drifted out into the fish-empty North
sea.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Ian Matthews
22nd July 03
I write to you today concerning the very emotive documentary
programme Hull's Angel. I am a Hull born student nearing 21
and I have issues to raise about two aspects of this documentary.
But, unaccustomed as I am in writing correspondence to TV stations,
I apologise now for any ranting or babbling that may be contained
in this letter as I have developed not only a strong affiliation
with the subject matter discussed in the programme, but a little
bit of frustration with how Hull always seems to be represented.
Currently I am living in Sunderland whereupon I am about
to enter my third year of a Film and Media degree course at
the university there. I have been involved in documenting
the issue of asylum seekers for roughly four years now; not
only has it been an integral part of my A-level and degree
study, I have also covered it for The Hull Daily Mail, Hull-Fire
student newspaper and radio and Sunderland's Utopia FM. Funny
thing is, the more I investigate the more tangled the issue
seems to become. This is what I will credit your documentary
for encapsulating; I've always found it tricky to show both
sides of the story without sounding clichéd or biased
in favour of liberal ideals. But what I do have a bit of a
problem with is the manner in which stereotypes of Hull have
been used to emphasise asylum seeker issues. Hull has yet
again been made to look like a run-down, ex-fishing town whose
general populous are un-educated bigots. The only interview
used outside of Tina's family, the vox-pop of the elderly
man outside the post office seemed to insinuate this all too
well. As a media student, I would consider myself savvy to
the ways of how to lead an audience and this appeared to me
to be a textbook example of how to make the protagonist appear
superior. Whilst this obviously has the benefit of creating
a more intriguing story, it does annoy me when it stereotypes
Hull natives like me.
I consider myself a very proud Hull native and it will forever
be my home; the more I travel around the country, the more
I realise that fact. The reason for this is because, contrary
to how the media tend to portray it, I have always found East
Yorkshire to be a wonderful place to live. The people on the
whole are very tolerant and friendly compared to others from
elsewhere I could mention. It is a huge, thriving city with
a great amount to offer and not the backwater berg that your
programme depicted it as being by only showing the shots the
derelict areas every city has. The majority of asylum seekers
I have spoken to have always said that they enjoyed living
in Hull and found more problems with internal issues such
as being placed in accommodation with someone that their country
was hostile toward or vice-versa. Sunderland however has been
a different matter all together. The hostility toward asylum
seekers there is drastically worse, so it is unfair to imply
that all asylum seekers are desperate to leave Hull as your
documentary again seemed to show.
But, this factor aside, that Channel 4 is willing to even
tackle such a volatile issue without any of the pomposity
and reactionary attitudes the BBC is showing with its series,
is commendable. I only hope it is an issue that will not just
be a flavour of the month.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|