Skip Channel4 main Navigation

|Powered By Google


Think TV YOUR VIEWS
YOUR VIEWS
Have Your Say
On TV
A To Z
News
FAQ
Feedback
Help
James Hewitt: Confessions of a Cad
Has this programme gone too far?


THINKTV
THINKTV
24th July 03
James Hewitt is one of the most hated men in England. Reviled for having an affair with the Princess of Wales, and all the more so for his perceived attempts to turn their history to his advantage, he has been tabloid fodder for more than a decade. Now, for the first time, he has allowed cameras into his life, to tell his side of the story. According to the media, he is a bounder with an underdeveloped sense of morality. According to friends, and countless women, he is a charming, irresistible scamp who is misunderstood and mistreated. Following the former army Major for six months as he enjoys the playboy lifestyle from Los Angeles to the Swiss Alps, this extraordinary film gets to know the real James Hewitt as he undergoes one of the most traumatic periods of his life, when his attempts to sell the infamous Diana letters earn him more public vitriol than ever before.
 
 
THINKTV
Matthew Sherratt
24th July 03
How low can Channel 4 go? Reading out Diana's love letters to James Hewitt is a total abuse of your responsibilites as a broadcaster. Not only is the woman dead so can't stop them being disclosed but in the name of decency and respect surely these things that were so personal to her are absolutely none of our business? That poor woman must be turning in her grave and as for how her family who are left behind will feel. .. An extremely selfish and desperate move on behalf of Channel 4 for ratings. I'm all for contraversial TV and remember laughing my socks off at the Brass Eye Paedophile programme but to be honest delving into someone's personal life so soon after they've gone is just plain bad taste and not even interesting. Stick to what you're good at - making more boring property programmes.
 
 
THINKTV
Geraldine Barlow
24th July 03
I am most disturbed to learn that Channel4 are considering reading out Princess Diana's letters to James Hewitt. Why can't we leave this woman to rest in peace and stop dragging up the past. Her Sons deserve to keep their memory of their Mother and not have her indiscretions read out to the world.
 
 
Lala Wilbraham
24th July 03
At best Channel 4 needs counselling: it is suffering from serious identity problems. Yes, variety is the spice of life,and a TV station might chose to please many sectors of the population,but the moment it sells its soul it's had it. Up to this evening I felt Channel 4 was, daring, cutting edge, brave, yes! But intelligent, commited to quality and integrity. Tonight's 'Confessions of a Cad'has thrown Channel 4 into the gutter, along with the very worst of the tabloid press. Why did I watch it? To be able to form an opinion. I have: Hewitt is no cad. He is utterly despicable. But, sadly, so is Channel 4. There is nothing wrong with doing programmes about contemptible people. But you don't have to be contemptible yourself in the way you do it
 
 
Peter
25th july 03
James Hewitt is undoubtedly a pretentious, idle, cad typical of his type. He will no doubt in time will release pictures of his relationship with the Princess, why should we care and why should he be paid a penny?
 
 
Amanda Biddell
24th July 03
I can not tell you how appauled and sickened I was by the comments of James Hewitt and his friends about the late Princess of Wales. This was the 1st time in my life that i have ever turned a programe off. To comment on the women that he was supposed to have cared about so much in such a derogatory manner just goes to show that he had no respect for her and has none for him self either. He may have money but he has no breeding or class and is in no way a gentle man, he should be ashamed of himself, as should Channel 4 for showing this disgusting program. Is this the best you can do?
 
 
Alt Tage Goes Here
Lee
25th July 03
To be honest, I don't know what all the fuss is about. With all of the hype surrounding this programme, I was expecting something revelatory about what a complete s**t this Hewitt chap really was... you know, some kind of jaw-droppingly bad faux-pas or something. He did come across as a nasty, mercenary piece of work, that's true. But I didn't see anything new about him that wasn't already public knowledge, thanks to his regular appearance in the tabloids. Instead, the impression I was left with at the end of the programme was that the film makers had heavily edited what little they actually had in an attempt to make him look as bad as possible. I understand that this is the idea in shock-tv, but I feel that the trick is to at least make it appear as if the editing has been light-handed. The interviewer was far too obvious in his interrogation, and the balance and objectivity was sadly, and very obviously, lacking.
 
top