Chat Ed : Welcome Professor Annette Karmiloff-Smith. She was the scientific
consultant on this series, studied in Geneva with the famous Swiss
psychologist, Jean Piaget, and is an award-winning author, broadcaster and
world authority on infant and child development. She recently published,
with her daughter, Kyra Karmiloff, a book on how children acquire language,
called 'Pathways to Language: From foetus to adolescent', Harvard University
Press, 2001 (for information: info@HUP-ITpress.co.uk), and also made a video
especially adapted to stimulating infants and toddlers called 'Babybright-2'
(for information: claire.flello@justgroup.com).
DF : Hello Annette!
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : This is Annette Karmiloff-Smith, I work at the
Institute of Child Health and I was the consultant on the programme and I'm
here to answer your questions.
DF : Annette, what do you think to Freud's theories of child development?
Admitedly they are far removed from any of Piaget's theories... do you think
they have any validity at all in the modern world of child psychology?
November : How far would you agree with Freud's theory of childhood
sexuality if at all?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : I think that Freud made us aware of repressed
thoughts. The knowledge that children repress many of their thoughts
- things like being angry at their parents, being jealous of a sibling - is
important to realise. But in my view, Freud didn't make the kind of
contribution that Piaget made, in
understanding how the child's mind develops over time. Freud was more
interested in emotion and Piaget in the growth of knowledge, which is what I
am interested in. I was a student of Piaget's in Geneva.
Becky : What do you think affects the speed at which children move between
stages of development?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : That's the 64 million dollar question! And an
important and interesting question, too. One factor is obviously the
way the brain develops.Brains develop in part through maturation and in part through
interaction with both the social and physical environments, so
movement from one level to another is a very dynamic process. It's
not
merely the environment, nor merely maturation of brain structures, but a
complex interaction between the two and this is the focus of many studies of
child development today. Children differ in their speed of processing which we
can measure, in their capacity to form accurate representations and
in their encounters
with the world. All of these affect overall transition from one
level to the next.
Becky, one of the exciting developments is that we
can now study *how* brains actually process the environment and we
can do this with
really young children throughout infancy, through childhood and adulthood.
We look at how the electrical activity in the brain fires in response to
different stimuli and how this activity progressively specialises in
various areas
of the brain over developmental time.
Notata Dignum : Why do you think Lev Vygotsky's ideas are currently so
popular within the education system as a model of the teachers role in
language acquisition?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : I'm not an expert in education, Notata, but I can see
why Vygotsky's ideas make sense in the education field. Our research on
infancy shows that infants respond to something that is SLIGHTLY different
from what they know up to now, but not too different. Basically this
continues throughout childhood, so Vygotsky's idea of zones of proximal
development capitalises on this way of attracting children's attention and
having them learn something new based on what they know already, but with a
small relevant change. Also Vygotsky placed a far greater role on language
than, say, Piaget did. But don't let's fall into the trap of thinking that
language alone gives rise to learning. Children have to understand the
concepts underlying the language being used. There is some nice research
with toddlers showing that if you take 2 objects that don't look like each
other, but give them the same name, the name won't help young
toddlers learn. But, just a year
later, they can use language (the same name applied to non-obvious
resembling objects) to categorise new objects. So, clearly language
plays an increasingly important role over developmental time. And
inner language - planning actions in advance - always plays an
increasing role.
tree : Have you done the same experiments on children in different
countries/societies? Do you find the same results?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : A lot of research is unfortunately based
soley on Western
society, but there have been studies in other cultures. One of the problems
is that we need to understand the culture itself before we can devise
suitable experiments. You can't just take in your Westernised experimental
set-up and impose it on another culture. They may have totally
different expectations of
the stimuli you present, different expectations of the interaction
between an adult and a child, and so forth. You have to adapt
properly to the culture in which you are carrying out your research.
However, when that has been done, in many areas there is an amazing
similarity across cultures in the way children start to learn language, to
learn about number and space. However, by the time children are
being educated and socialised in some way, subtle differences start
to appear. So one might
say that there are some cross-cultural universals and at the same time
interesting cross-cultural differences. There are cultures for
instance whose counting system
is carried out on the body - it is very complex but different to
ours. Yet if you look beyond the surface, you find surprising
similarities in the learning process.
DF : Do you ever have problems finding children for your case studies? What
do the parents make of your work?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : No, we don't have problems. Parents are usually very
interested in research and willing to participate. I work with
infants and children with genetic
disorders. But we always need normally developing control children for our
studies too. When they are very young, infants and toddlers come
into our baby lab, and when they
are older, we usually go out to their schools to do the testing.
Because we make our experiments feel
like games, often computer-presented, children love to participate.
After the experiment we always
debrief parents to tell them what we were trying to discover. My experience
has been that both children and parents love to participate. We
usually provide a nice certificate afterwards thanking the child for
furthering our knowledge of science. Some parents frame them for
their children's rooms.
ted : Pinker believes that only 5% (at most) of a child's personality is due
to home life and parental contribution. Do you agree?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : I tend to disagree with quite a bit of what Pinker
writes in his popular books. I think he is a brilliantly
entertaining writer, but he is focussed on
trying to show that our genes account for most outcomes -
personality, emotions, language
and so forth. If you get on to the Guardian Education website
there is a summary of a talk that I gave this week at the British
academy, which tells
the story of gene expression in terms of a Sherlock Holmes detective
story: Elementary, my dear Watson, the clue is in the genes...or is
it?
This talk highlights some of my differences of opinion with Pinker.
Josephine : what would you consider to be normal sibling rivalry behaviour
for a two year old towards his newborn brother? Is hitting and pinching to
be expected, albeit accompanied by extreme hugging and kissing? He has a
genetic disorder which may or may not involve learning impairement and is
currently referred for speech therapy. It's difficult to tell whether his
outbursts towards the baby are related to this since he is otherwise full of
affection for everyone around him....
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : Josephine, everyone should show some form of sibling
rivalry. A child who is always too nice to the newborn intruder is a child
one should perhaps worry about. Imagine if your husband came home and said,
'Josephine, this is Elizabeth, she is moving in with us, she's going to share
our bed, I'm going to pamper to her every need'. How would you feel? That's
how most 2 year olds feel when a newborn arrives! Of course, there is
affection as well - in fact, a conflict between affection and
rivalry. If the older sibling is rough,
remove him or her firmly but calmly if there is any danger to the
baby. Never make the older child feel guilty because his or her
feelings are normal.
But, let the baby cry a little while you cuddle the older
child. I doubt that your son's reactions are only due to the genetic disorder,
because you can see his behaviour is found in all normally
developing children too.
In a sense, he's telling you how much he loves you, and wants to be
loved by you.
Chat Ed : Our half hour with Professor Annette Karmiloff-Smith is nearly up
now, so last two questions now, thanks...
FD : Which side of the nature/nurture debate do you take?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : Neither side. The dichotomy between nature or nurture
is a false one. Genes obviously play an important role in human development,
but there is no direct mapping between genes and cognitive outcomes. What we
really need to understand is the *dynamic interaction* between nature and
nurture. In my view calculating, say, 40% nurture and 60% nature
makes absolutely
no sense. If we can one day understand the dynamic process of gene
expression, the dichotomy between the two will actually disappear. We need to
understand the dynamics of developmental trajectories.
Chat Ed : And lastly:
Jo Hammersley : I would like to become a clinical child psychologist. I
have done a degree in psychology and am working as a teacher's assistant for
kids with learning difficulties whilst applying for assistant posts. Do you
have any suggestions/advice to help me achieve this goal?
Ellen : What qualifications do you need for child pyschology?
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : Jo, it's very competitive to get on to clinical
courses. My experience has been that after a degree in psychology, your best
bet is to work for one or two years in a clinical setting, for instance in a
hospital, in a special needs clinic, etc. Above all try to get
involved in some
research. People on clinical panels are less impressed with statements like
'I want to help others' and would prefer to hear 'I want to have a deeper
understanding of human behaviour and I have done research to find this out'.
Don't be on a hurry to get on a course. Get some experience first. Talk to
other students who have successfully got onto courses. That's how one of my
students was successful, first by working for a year in research,
then cross-questioning all the students who had managed to get on
courses. Good luck with your future!
Chat Ed : For more information: Professor Annette Karmiloff-Smith recently
published, with her daughter Kyra Karmiloff, a book on how children acquire
language, called 'Pathways to Language: From foetus to adolescent', Harvard
University Press, 2001 - email info@HUP-ITpress.co.uk for information, and
also made a video especially adapted to stimulating infants and toddlers
called 'Babybright-2' - email claire.flello@justgroup.com for more
information.
Chat Ed : That's it! Thanks for that Professor, great stuff! Thanks for
joining us tonight everyone.
derekandclive : Cheers Annette. Cats are less work. :D
DF : Goodbye Annette, it's been nice discussing your work with you, we'd
Love you back soon :)
felicity : byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
clo : *bye
Lara_C : bye!!!
J Afton : Thank You
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : Thank you all for your very interesting questions.
Josephine : Thanx bye
November : It's been interesting
Prof Karmiloff-Smith : I'm glad you watched the series. It was great fun
making it.
Gracie : Thanks for answering my question........
Prof Karmiloff-Smith leaves the room