The Swan: John and Patsy's finished development in Staines

Episode Information Property Ladder: Bishop's Waltham

Email this page

Contents:

Date Published:
12/06/2008

In a credit crunchingly volatile market Sarah's back, following two epic builds in Bishop's Waltham and Windsor. When money’s tight all round it pays to get the most bang for your buck, but does adding square footage always add value?

Tindalls. Bishop's Waltham And Windsor. Property Ladder

In Bishop's Waltham, Hampshire, tanning salon owners Andy and Amanda Tindall have bought a rather ordinary looking 1950s house. But there's nothing ordinary about their plans. They're gearing up to supersize their property into nothing short of a mansion, by adding extensions that will quadruple its size.

Bishop's Waltham: Budget

Bought for: £600,000
Renovation budget: £250,000
Actual spend: £350,000


Despite original valuations of £950,000, £1.1 million and £1.3 million, eleven months on, Andy and Amanda still haven’t managed to find a buyer for their house. They're currently living in it and waiting to see what happens to the market. But they’ve not hung up their development hats - and have just started two new ones.

The Parnells. Bishop's Waltham And Windsor. Property Ladder

In Windsor, Royal Berkshire, metal engineer John Parnell are his wife Patsy have bought a Victorian mock Tudor property and are planning not one but two extensions to it.

They're relying on the experience from doing up their last 13 family homes to see them through a tight six month schedule.

Windsor: Budget

Bought for: £425,000
Renovation budget: £62,000
Actual spend: £158,000
Sold for: £595,000
Profit: £12,000

Valuations originally came in at £675,000, £685,000 and £695,000, so John and Patsy decided to put it on the market for £695,000. After eight months in a steeply declining market, they accepted an offer of £595,000, making them a gross profit of just £12,000.

But making only a two per cent return on their development didn't stop them from going on to buy another property to develop...

Your Comments

Post your comment

Please note: In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in to Channel 4:

Sign In Here or Register Here

Comments closed

Comments are closed at the present time

Your comments

Post your comment
By posting on this website you are agreeing to abide by our Comments Policy.
Mandatory Fields are marked with *
Your Comment (Maximum characters: 4000) *
You have

Comments

Thank you for your comment!

Your message will be reviewed and the best ones will be published below.

If you intended to make an official comment to Channel 4 please contact us.

Comments

  1. This is the second week running that a couple has bought an architecturally interesting house and ruined it, this week's example in Windsor being the worst. Doesn't Sarah Beeney have an obligation where it is obvious a house should be protected from developers (amateur or otherwise) to inform those who might have an architectural interest. If she had done so, this house might have been listed and thus saved from Patsy's dreadful back extension.
    Posted by Christine on 19/08/2009 08:01:20
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  2. I saw this episode and I really enjoyed it. While searching something else on the net, I came across this page and I wanted to say well done for a great show.
    Posted by Adil on 29/08/2008 13:53:46
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment

Advertisement

More on 4Homes

4Homes Property Search

Over 300,000 properties to search, interactive maps, neighbourhood reports and more...

 

e.g. Notting Hill, SW3, Glasgow

Powered by: Nestoria

Housing Market News & Views

House Prices

Obeying Beeny

Advertisement


4Homes

Skip Channel4 main Navigation
Explore Channel4
Food
Homes
Film
4Car
News
See All

Channel 4 © 2009. Channel 4 is not responsible for the content of external websites.