There a number of measures you can apply to make your home more energy efficient.

Essential Guides & Advice Energy Performance Certificates

Email this page

Contents:

Date Published:
22/05/2008

I've been writing a lot about HIPs recently, and there has been much bad press in particular about the Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), specifically that the assessors (Domestic Energy Assessors or DEAs) are not well enough trained to carry out their jobs and that a bad report could negatively affect the sale of your home. I invited a DEA around to assess my home, so I could give you the rundown.

By Lucy Searle

4Homes Essentials
Property Search
UK Region Ratings

The Visit

The DEA started by taking photos of my property from the front and back; she also took note of the age of my home, its size in cubic metres, what material it was built from, and whether it was terraced, semi-detached or detached. My house is late Victorian brick and was naturally built without any kind of wall insulation- a few points off there then, but it is terraced, so only two sides of it are external, or what she called "part of the heat loss perimeter".

We then went and looked at my boiler, which is a new condensing boiler (so I scored points there); the DEA noted down the model number and SEDBUK code (SEDBUK stands for Standard Efficiency Database of Boilers of the UK). She then moved around the house to check whether I had thermostatic radiator valves (which I do) and a room thermostat (ditto, more points).

The DEA also checked out our hot water supply. Again, the immersion is a new one, so I scored well there.

A DEA inspection can improve your home's energy efficiency

Loft Or No Loft?

After that, I was asked if I had secondary heating anywhere, electric or gas fires for example, and whether my loft was insulated. The upper floor of my house was built into the eaves, so there is no loft. I told her that the roof insulation had been checked when we put in Velux windows, and that I know these particular rooms hold their heat well.

However, because DEAs fill in what's basically a multiple choice form, there is no box which says "there is no loft, but the roof's well insulated". The result was that she had to tick a box which said "no access" (ie, to the loft), which means my "phantom" loft shows up as uninsulated, because the software defaults to the worse case scenario.

For the record, if you do have a loft space, the assessor will check that your insulation sits properly positioned between the rafters, and will look at its depth, but they merely do a "head and shoulders job" rather than climbing right in and pulling up every piece. If your loft is boarded, you may be able to get away with just showing off a section, otherwise it may show as "no access".

Energy-saving light bulbs are a cheap way to save energy

Extra Points

Once that was done, the DEA asked whether I had double glazing (I don't, and I live in a conservation area, so theoretically, I'm somewhat limited- points off there). She then moved around the house checking the heating controls, specifically whether I had a room thermostat (I do) and thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs), which allow me to control- and lower the heating in rooms that aren't in use or don't need to be as warm as, say, the living room. Again, I've got new radiators throughout, and I had TRVs fitted on each one (points back on for those).

We also talked about floor insulation, and I told her that we had had the floors insulated between each of the storeys- both to keep heat in the various rooms (ie, to stop it rising to the top of the house), and to deaden noise. I was told that this is not measured- although it did then show up on the EPC as "no insulation".

Lastly, she took a note of how many energy-saving light bulbs we have around the house. Like many householders, I'm replacing my old stock of normal bulbs with energy-saving ones as they run out, so I've got about half and half (points off, could try harder.

Check out the mortgage calculator, loans, credit cards & savings comparison tools

Your Comments

Post your comment

Please note: In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in to Channel 4:

Sign In Here or Register Here

Comments closed

Comments are closed at the present time

Your comments

Post your comment
By posting on this website you are agreeing to abide by our Comments Policy.
Mandatory Fields are marked with *
Your Comment (Maximum characters: 4000) *
You have

Comments

Thank you for your comment!

Your message will be reviewed and the best ones will be published below.

If you intended to make an official comment to Channel 4 please contact us.

Comments

  1. This was very interesting, asI have been looking into ways of improving efficiency in my home. like your all my walls are concrete/old victorian style, but enegy saving llight bulbs, solar panels,a re all something i can look into. cheers v interesting
    Posted by rgawthorne on 13/10/2008 14:02:17
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment
  2. I read your article with interest, and indeed in this "case study" the assessor has observed the many facets that are required on the RdSAP (Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure). RdSAP has to make certain assumptions about the property construction, lighting and heating parameters the latter based on "average usage", with this program it is possible to predict an energy assessment of a property based on these principles. DEA's know this, the alternative would be to conduct an "invasive survey" such as remove floorings to determine construction, remove boardings in loft spaces to determine insulation values. Clearly, the homeowner would not wish their home torn apart to determine these factors, hence RdSAP makes certain assumptions about areas with no access, usually based on the age of the property build. In this particular case double glazing could not be recommended as the property is in a conservation area, the only real option here is to install secondary glazing. The assessor in this study had suggested reasonable improvements to make the home more energy efficient. Photovoltaic panels, although a good renewable energy source have a long "payback" time, due to the expense incurred. Similarly, due to the recent increases in gas and electricity prices there has been a rush of interest in domestic wind turbines, probably sold on the pretext that you can "export" electricity back to the grid, and save money at the same time, however, for most homeowners this is not really an option as in most cases the turbine induces a great deal of vibration if mounted on a house, and, will not produce sufficient energy to claim credit by exporting excess power back to the grid. At the end of the day the conclusion is it not what you've got - its how you use it. Consumption is the biggest factor of all, if you use it a little or not at all, then you will certainly save money on energy bills no matter how well or poorly the efficiency rating is applied to the property, simple measures to reduce consumption and heat losses in any property will without doubt will save the homeowner money.
    Posted by Chris Wood on 16/09/2008 19:08:24
    Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this comment

Advertisement

More on 4Homes

4Homes Property Search

Over 300,000 properties to search, interactive maps, neighbourhood reports and more...

 

e.g. Notting Hill, SW3, Glasgow

Powered by: Nestoria

Advertisement


4Homes

Skip Channel4 main Navigation
Explore Channel4
Food
Homes
Film
4Car
News
See All

Channel 4 © 2009. Channel 4 is not responsible for the content of external websites.